Legal Opinion
In re estate of Roebling
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 18, 1919PublishedCited by 17 opinions
On appeal from a decree of the ordinary. On motion to dismiss appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, Chief-Justice.
The appeal in this case was taken from a decree of the ordinary setting aside, pro tanto, the assessment of a transfer tax laid by the comptroller of the state treasury upon the estate of Ferdinand W. Roebling. deceased, who, at the time of his death, in March, 1917, was a resident of the state.
Our act to tax the transfer of property of resident and nonresident decedents (P. L. 1909 p. 325), after enacting in section *731 that a tax should be imposed upon the transfer of any property, real or personal, of resident and non-resident…
2Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Estate of LichtensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. SuydamNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- Palmer v. PalmerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- In Re BurnettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Lehigh Valley R. Co. of New Jersey v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.