Snayberger's Estate
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311 and 312, Oct. T., 1915, by Sallie Kistler, et al., from decree of O. O. Schuylkill Co.’, Jan. T., 1915, No. 23, ■ dismissing exceptions to adjudication in Estate of F. S. Snayberger, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. From the record it appeared that F. S. Snayberger died Oct. 30, 1913, leaving a will dated Aug. 26, 1897. When the will was made decedent was married to a second wife by whom he had nine children.
Read the full summary
Appeals, Nos. 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311 and 312, Oct. T., 1915, by Sallie Kistler, et al., from decree of O. O. Schuylkill Co.’, Jan. T., 1915, No. 23, ■ dismissing exceptions to adjudication in Estate of F. S. Snayberger, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. From the record it appeared that F. S. Snayberger died Oct. 30, 1913, leaving a will dated Aug. 26, 1897. When the will was made decedent was married to a second wife by whom he had nine children. On February 24, 1893, he gave to each of the nine children a promissory note, in the following form: Molino, Pa., Feb. 24, 1893.…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
This case arose on the distribution of the estate of F. S. Snayberger. The appellant is one of nine children to each of whom the decedent gave a promise in writing for $600.00 payable six months after the maker’s death. The instruments were not under seal. They were all given on February 24, 1893, at which time the decedent was a widower. He married the appellee on the 19th of April, 1894, and died October 30, 1913. The writings thus given were presented for allowance as debts of the decedent. An objection was made thereto by the widow on the ground that they were not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Standen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tissue's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Ruetschlin's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1933