Legal Opinion

Clark v. Durland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1905Published

Appeal from Special Term, Orange County. Action by Elizabeth Clark and another against Jesse Durland. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

1Per curiam

The judgment for the defendant, rendered at Special Term, upon the second trial of this case, which now comes up for review, was required by the views expressed by this court upon the first appeal. Clark v. Durland, 35 App. Div. 312, 55 N. Y. Supp. 14. The additional evidence did not suffice to establish the plaintiffs’ title. The judgment obtained at their instance after the first trial of this action, reforming the deed from Mary A. Durland to Elizabeth Barrell and others so as to exclude from the description therein “eight and seventy one-hundredths acres of land covered by the waters of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. DurlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API