Legal Opinion

Decatur Corp. v. Friedman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 7, 1941No. 90259PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PINE, Justice.

Defendant has moved the court to vacate the verdict of the jury and judgment entered thereon in favor of plaintiff and to enter judgment for defendant in accordance with the motion of defendant for a directed verdict made by defendant at the close of all the evidence or in the alternative to grant a new trial.

Motion for Judgment for Defendant.

This action grows out of an agreement entered into on May 31, 1935, between plaintiff and defendant by the terms of which plaintiff agreed to sell and defendant agreed to buy for a stipulated consideration certain lots and parts of lots in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Jackson v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Morris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Karlson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harrington v. HeaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API