Legal Opinion

State v. Craig

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 21, 1994No. 69,978PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This case considers whether a half-blood uncle is subject to prosecution under K.S.A. 21-3603, the aggravated incest statute.

A Question Reserved By The Prosecution

Our jurisdiction is under K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(3), an appeal upon a question reserved by the prosecution. The State indicates in its notice of appeal that jurisdiction is under K.S.A. 22-3602(b)(l), an appeal from an order dismissing the complaint, information, or indictment. However, we are informed by the State’s docketing statement, Rule 2.041 (1993 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 10), that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. State v. RuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. State v. SchleinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BerrethSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. MathisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Tapscott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Tapscott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API