Legal Opinion
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Williams
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Motion to dismiss the complaint. The opinion states the ease.
1Opinion of the CourtBetts, J.
In this action the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendant from proceeding under section 12 of the Labor Law *to recover penalties for violating sections 10 and 11 of said law, on the ground that such sections 10 and 11 are in violation of the Constitution of the United States and of the State of Hew York, and, therefore, void. The sections in question are the following sections of the Labor Law:
Section 10. “ Cash payment of wages.— Every manufacturing, mining, quarrying, mercantile, railroad, street railway, canal, steamboat, telegraph and telephone company, every express company, every…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Sweet v. RechelSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Berea College v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lord v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. VetriNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re the Will of HartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- People ex rel. Cohoes Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- People v. Primrose Wet Wash Laundry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- New York Central & Hudson River v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909