Legal Opinion

Kaskaskia Bridge Co. v. Shannon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1844PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit in the Randolph Circuit Court. The case was heard before the Hon. James Semple and a jury, at the April term 1843, when a verdict and judgment was rendered in' favor of the plaintiffs below for the sum of $1540*11, to reverse which the defendants prosecuted their writ of error in this Court The material facts appéar in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Shields, J.

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiffs in error as the drawers of four several drafts or orders on the treasurer of the Company, payable to the defendants, two of which were dated July 1,1841, each for the sum of $150. One was dated Sept 2, 1841, for $908-49, and the other was dated Oct. 1, 1841, for $190-55. The declaration was in the usual form in such cases.

The defendants in the Court helow pleaded,

1. Non Assumpsit.

2. That the said drafts, or bills of exchange, were given without any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nicholls v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Union Bank v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Widdifield v. WiddifieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1810
  4. Curtis v. InghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1829
  5. Wilson v. GaleNew York Supreme Court · 1830

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kane v. WehnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  2. Dale v. RichardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API