Dullen v. State

DICKSON, Justice.

Defendant David Dullen brings this direct appeal to question his conviction, following jury trial, for burglary 1 and theft 2 , and habitual offender determination. He raises the following issues:

1. sufficiency of evidence;

2. habitual offender proceedings as a violation of due process guarantees; and,

8. irregularity in habitual offender sentencing.

In arguing that the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence, defendant contends that he was convicted solely on the testimony of another witness, defendant's accomplice, of highly questionable credibility, and whose…