Legal Opinion

Stobaugh v. Twin City Bank

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 5, 1989No. 88-166PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ronald E. Bumpass,

Special Chief Justice. This is an appeal of a decision granting appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The case was brought by a creditor of the limited partnerships to enforce individual capital contribution promissory notes subsequent to default by each of the limited partners. While separate actions were brought against limited partnership, the action was consolidated by the chancellor, argued, and decided on common facts.

Memphis Advisory Group, Inc. (“MAG”), a Tennessee corporation, served as the sole general partner to four limited partnerships formed in Arkansas. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Partnership Equities, Inc. v. MartenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Williams v. J. W. Black Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Chelsea National Bank v. Lincoln Plaza Towers AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Scroggins v. BowenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arkansas Department of Education; Johnny Key, in His Official Capacity as Arkansas Commissioner of Education; And Diane Zook, Susan Chambers, Charisse Dean, R. Brett Williamson, O. Fitzgerald Hill, Ouida Newton, Sarah Moore, and Kathy McFetridge, in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Arkansas State Board of Education v. Amber Booth McCoy; Don Booth; Katherine Lu; Eugene Lu; And Skye AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API