Legal Opinion

Sanderson v. Bigham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 5, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Hudson, J., Florence, February, 1893. This was an action commenced on December 31,1892, for the partition of land devised to plaintiff and defendant by the will of their mother, who died October 11, 1890.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McGowan.

Mrs. Mary Bigharn, of Florence County, died in 1870, leaving a will, of which her daughter, the plaintiff, and her son, the defendant, are the qualified executrix and executor. It would seem that the plaintiff and defendant were her only children, to whom she bequeathed and devised the whole of her estate. The second clause of her will reads as follows: “All my right, title, and interest in a portion *502or bract of land, it being the tract containing the old homestead of my husbaud, Leonard Smiley Bigham, sr., deceased, I give to my…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee v. . MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Barnett v. BarnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Plummer v. PlummerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API