Legal Opinion

Town of Orford v. New Hampshire Air Resources Commission

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 2, 1986No. 85-438PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The plaintiffs challenge the validity of two administrative rules of the New Hampshire Air Resources Commis*540sion prohibiting the open burning of waste. After a hearing before a Master (Robert E. Hinchey, Esq.), the Trial Court (Hollman, J.) (DiClerico, J., on supplemental order) upheld the rules. We vacate the court’s order and dismiss the action, on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to prove the existence of a justiciable controversy.

The plaintiffs are eight New Hampshire towns with populations of fewer than 1000. Each town traditionally has used open-burning dumps as a means of disposing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  2. Millett v. Hoisting Engineers' Licensing Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  3. In Re School-Law ManualSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  4. Silver Brothers, Inc. v. WallinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. Salem Coalition for Caution, Inc. v. Town of SalemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Asmussen v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of SafetySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  2. Bel Air Associates v. New Hampshire Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. Avery v. New Hampshire Department of EducationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  4. In re Southern New Hampshire Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  5. State v. WilleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API