Legal Opinion

Hickman v. Hickman

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 21, 1996No. 2950107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

YATES, Judge.

On October 17, 1990, the trial court divorced the parties, incorporating into the final divorce judgment an agreement in which the wife was to receive, among other things, $1000 per month in periodic alimony. In October 1992, the husband petitioned for a modification of the periodic alimony, arguing that his unemployment was a material change in circumstances requiring a reduction; the court denied the husband’s petition on October 5,1994.

In April 1995, the wife brought a contempt proceeding against her former husband for his failure to pay periodic alimony. The evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Price v. PriceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ward v. WardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API