Legal Opinion
Spohn v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1941No. 28292PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
This case presents the following question for determination: Where a resident of Ohio enters into a contract of employment in the state of Michigan with a Michigan corporation, to perform services in interstate commerce only, receives his salary and instructions from his employer in the state of Michigan, and is certified to the Industrial Accident Board of Michigan, and thereafter while in Ohio, is in jured in the course of his employment, is such workman entitled to compensation from the State Insurance Fund of Ohio?
As plaintiff’s employment was limited to interstate commerce, and as his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Roberts v. I. X. L. Glass Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Ohio v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McBride v. Coble Express, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Basham v. Southeastern Motor Truck Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Industrial Commission v. Watson Bros. Transp. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Hammonds v. Freymiller Trucking, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Dotson v. Com Trans, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.