Legal Opinion

Fiscus v. Salazar

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 16, 2021No. 6:21-cv-01127Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Paul A. Fiscus, III, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 21-1127-EFM-KGG Joe R. Salazar, Laci M. Salazar, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Paul A. Fiscus, III, proceeds pro se asserting that his parental rights were wrongly terminated after the adoption of his infant child. Plaintiff sues the adoptive couple, Defendants Joe and Laci Salazar, seeking restoration of his parental rights, full custody of his child, and damages. There are multiple motions pending before the Court. Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss Amended…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API