Legal Opinion

Coca-Cola International Corp. v. New York Trust Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 16, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

When the bill in this case was filed and until recently, viz., on May 7, 1938, the date of a stip* ulation entered into between the parties, the only possible claimants to the stock, so far as the pleadings show, were the Georgia executors on the one hand and the New York temporary administrator on the other. The stipulation just referred to, however, shows that the will has been proved recently in New York and an administrator c. t. a. has been appointed in that jurisdiction. The appointment of the temporary administrator was upon the theory of an intestacy. The appointment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Overby v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Wilkins v. EllettSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Thormann v. FrameSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. In Re the Estate of CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. In re the Estate of ShontsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riley v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. New York Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  3. Bowles v. R. G. Dun-Bradstreet Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1940
  4. Riley v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API