Legal Opinion

Delaney v. First Fin. of Charleston, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 8, 2019No. Appellate Case 2017-000683; Opinion 27884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE HEARN :

*250 **609 This case concerns when a claim for deficient notice of disposition of collateral under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code accrues for statute of limitation purposes. The circuit court held the limitations period began upon receipt of the allegedly deficient notice, and the court of appeals affirmed in a split decision. Delaney v. First Fin. of Charleston, Inc. , 418 S.C. 209 , 791 S.E.2d 546 (Ct. App. 2016). We hold the limitations period begins only upon disposition; accordingly, we reverse.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In October of 2007, Petitioner Otha Delaney…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pressley v. Tupperware Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Gordon v. Phillips Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re: Otha Marvin DelaneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
  2. Otha Marvin DelaneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API