Delaney v. First Fin. of Charleston, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HEARN :
*250 **609 This case concerns when a claim for deficient notice of disposition of collateral under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code accrues for statute of limitation purposes. The circuit court held the limitations period began upon receipt of the allegedly deficient notice, and the court of appeals affirmed in a split decision. Delaney v. First Fin. of Charleston, Inc. , 418 S.C. 209 , 791 S.E.2d 546 (Ct. App. 2016). We hold the limitations period begins only upon disposition; accordingly, we reverse.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In October of 2007, Petitioner Otha Delaney…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pressley v. Tupperware Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Tilley v. Pacesetter Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Gordon v. Phillips Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re: Otha Marvin DelaneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
- Otha Marvin DelaneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2025