Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2010No. 49A04-1001-CR-46Published

1DissentVaidik, Judge

I respectfully dissent with the majority's conclusion that Moore was not in a public place or place of public resort within the meaning of Indiana Code section 7.1-5-1-3. I would therefore affirm her conviction for public intoxication. __

Indiana Code section 7.1-5-1-3 provides, "It is a Class B misdemeanor for a person to be in a public place or a place of public resort in a state of intoxication caused by the person's use of alcohol or a controlled substance (as defined in IC 35-48-1-9)." With respect to intoxicated people in private vehicles, the Indiana Supreme Court has held that a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Miles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Breaston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Atkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API