Lovins v. Laub
New York Supreme Court
Action by receiver in supplementary proceedings to reach interest of judgment debtor in partnership.
1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.
I find as matter of fact that Joseph Laub, of whose property plaintiff has been appointed receiver in supplementary proceedings, was, at the time of the commencement of such proceedings and at the time of the appointment of the receiver, a part*337ner of the defendant Jacob Lanb in the firm of Laub Bros. The question then arises, What are the rights of the plaintiff in the partnership property? The rule of law determinative of this question was well stated by Chancellor Walworth in Buchan v. Sumner, 2 Barb. Ch. 165, 197, as follows : “ It is a settled principle of the law of partnership, that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Buchan v. SumnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- McCorkle v. . HerrmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Marquand v. President of New-York Manufacturing Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1820
- Conrad v. BuckWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Drexel v. . PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perry Bank Trust Company v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931