Legal Opinion
Boldon v. Humana Insurance
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 13, 2006No. CV06-02818 PHXNVWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WAKE, District Judge.
This order addresses whether the plaintiffs insurance carrier should be preliminarily enjoined to provide coverage for the plaintiffs prescribed medical treatment under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
I. Findings of Fact
A. The Parties
Plaintiff Michael J. Boldon (“Boldon”) is a 54-year old employee of Cutter Aviation, Inc. Since January 1, 2005, Boldon has been enrolled in the Cutter Aviation Group Medical…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Shirley O. Fought v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baxter v. MBA Group Insurance Trust Health & Welfare PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- Parsons v. Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 2011