Legal Opinion

Park v. Stanford

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2011No. 20091082PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice DURHAM,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

11 This appeal concerns the application of payments made in connection with a real estate transaction between Dr. Gary B. Stanford and Kang and Marsha Park. The court of appeals held that payments submitted to the Parks could not be credited toward a personal guaranty Dr. Stanford had made on a note payable to the Parks. Noting that this appeal presents an issue of first impression, we disagree with the court of appeals' analysis and adopt a "reasonable basis test" governing the application of payments toward a personal guaranty. Further,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  3. Jensen Ex Rel. Jensen v. CunninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. Small Business Investment Co. of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. State v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  2. Sutton v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Stone Flood & Fire Restoration, Inc. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Feasel v. Tracker MarineUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Cloward v. RaceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API