Foshay v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
The post office at Mamaroneck is in the first class. In 1926, the plaintiff was appointed a clerk there. He was in the classified civil service. In his complaint, he alleges that in 1931 he was wrongfully discharged. He seeks judgment for his salary since a date shortly prior to the discharge. The suit rests jurisdiction on the Tucker Act (28 USCA § 41, subd. 20).
By notice dated August 15, 1931, the government moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. At the oral argument, several grounds were urged. Upon examining the papers, I concluded…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- McGregor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1904
- United States v. McCroryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Callahan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Kohlman v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Baskins v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1940
- Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.