Mahoney v. City of Chelsea
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, C.J.
This is the city’s appeal from a judgment of the Land Court3 which determined that the proposed salt importing operations of Eastern Minerals, Inc. (Eastern), on land leased from S.M.P. Trust (S.M.P.) on the waterfront in Chelsea, will constitute a commercial dock, a permitted use under the Chelsea zoning ordinance. The city argues that the Land Court judge erred by not concluding that Eastern’s proposed *92operations would constitute a wholesale storage and distribution business rather than a commercial dock. We affirm the judgment.
We summarize the facts found by the Land Court judge with some…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Commonwealth v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Nichols v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Town of Needham v. Winslow Nurseries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- In Re Civil Investigative Demand Addressed to Yankee Milk, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Derby Refining Co. v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Continental Terminals, Inc. v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- C&J Trucking, Inc. v. GrayMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994
- Wells v. Zoning BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003