State v. Hilton
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
A jury convicted appellant Louis Hilton of assault and battery, with intent to kill. Hilton claims that there was evidence showing that he had no intent to kill his victim and therefore the trial judge should have charged the jury on the lesser included offense of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature. We agree and reverse.
Hilton and his victim, Joseph McKelvie, were standing on a sidewalk by a railroad crossing when the incident occurred. The evidence indicates that they may have been arguing, but there was no evidence of a physical fight. McKelvie was drunk at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- State v. HiottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. FoustSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. PilgrimCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- State v. HiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.