Legal Opinion

Joy v. Craig

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1936No. 4591PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The facts of this case are reported in the opinion on a former appeal. (Tex.Civ.App.) 81 S.W.(2d) 261. We briefly supplement these.

Appellant owned and operated a high-density cotton compress in the town of Childress. Appellee was employed thereat as a tie pusher. It was'part of his. duty to retrieve broken ties. He alleges injuries received while performing this duty, fully detailed in our former opinion supra. Appellee’s petition alleges, in part:

“That he. (appellant) has had in his employ more than three men during all the times material to the matters involved herei in, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Magnolia Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. DardenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. West Texas Coaches, Inc. v. MadiTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Boyles v. McClureTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. ShuddeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McClelland v. MoungerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Luhning v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. DiebelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Atlantic Pipe Line Co. v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Texas State Bank & Trust Co. v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API