Sorensen v. Eshelman

SWANN, Judge.

The defendant, Charles E. Sorensen, appeals from an adverse final judgment rendered upon a $17,772.73 jury verdict.

He asserts that reversible error was committed in the trial court’s failure to direct a verdict for him and in the court’s failure to rule that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by the Statute of Frauds. We disagree.

An examination of the record reveals sufficient conflict of evidence to affirm the judgment of the trial court in denying the defendant’s several motions for a directed verdict. See City of Hialeah v. Revels, Fla.App.1960, 123 So.2d 400.

The defendant never…