Andersen v. Sportmart, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

COSBEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the May 5, 1998, motion of General Sportcraft (“Sportcraft”), a Third Party Plaintiff, for leave to conduct discovery on the issue of whether personal jurisdiction exists over the Third Party Defendant, Taiwan Daido (“Daido”). Daido filed a response on May 8,1998, and oral argument was heard on the motion on May 12,1998. For the following reasons, Sportcraft’s motion will be GRANTED.

*238II. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On July 27, 1992, Amanda Anderson (“Anderson”) was…