Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Parra Perez

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 28, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01224Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01224-AWI-EPG 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN 14 MARIA DEL CARMEN PARRA PEREZ, SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT et al., JUDGMENT 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Jose Acosta’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for default 18 judgment against Defendants Thu Huynh, Ngoc Tran, and THNBT LLC (“Defendants”). (ECF 19 No. 58.) As discussed below, the Court will grant Plaintiff leave to submit further supplemental 20 briefing in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Balbir Singh Tuli, Debtor. Balbir Singh Tuli v. Republic of IraqCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Robert Draper v. Davis S. CoombsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Internet Solutions for Business Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Daniel Lopez v. Catalina Channel Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API