Sandoval v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
There is no question but that the timeliness of the filing of a claim goes to the subject matter jurisdiction of this court. (Reed v State of New York, 147 AD2d 767.) Alternatively, the weight of authority is that the method of service of a claim goes only to the issue of acquiring personal jurisdiction over the defendant and may therefore be waived. (Reed v State of New York, 147 AD2d 767, supra; Thomas v State of New York, 144 AD2d 882; Colon v State of New York, 146 Misc 2d 1034; cf., Finnerty v New York State Thruway Auth., 75 NY2d 721.) *1073The issue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Finnerty v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Baggett v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Antoine v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1980
- Thomas v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Reed v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Calco v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991