Legal Opinion

Sandoval v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided July 17, 1990No. Claim No. 79433PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerard M. Weisberg, J.

There is no question but that the timeliness of the filing of a claim goes to the subject matter jurisdiction of this court. (Reed v State of New York, 147 AD2d 767.) Alternatively, the weight of authority is that the method of service of a claim goes only to the issue of acquiring personal jurisdiction over the defendant and may therefore be waived. (Reed v State of New York, 147 AD2d 767, supra; Thomas v State of New York, 144 AD2d 882; Colon v State of New York, 146 Misc 2d 1034; cf., Finnerty v New York State Thruway Auth., 75 NY2d 721.) *1073The issue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Finnerty v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Baggett v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Antoine v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Thomas v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Reed v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Calco v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API