Legal Opinion

(SS) Dodson v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 25, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01172Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARLENE DODSON, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-1172 - JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER REMANDING THE ACTION PURSUANT ) TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) 13 v. ) ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN 14 ANDREW M. SAUL1, ) FAVOR OF MARLENE DODSON, AND AGAINST Commissioner of Social Security, ) DEFENDANT ANDREW M. SAUL, 15 ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant. ) 16 ) 17 Marlene Dodson asserts she is entitled to a period of disability and disability insurance benefits 18 under Title II of the Social Security Act.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API