Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 14, 2011No. Criminal No. 1986-0166Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Crim. No. 86-166 (TFH) vs. GUY Q. JOHNSON, Defendant. \z\/\a\aa\J\/\./\/§/ MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Mr. Johnson’s Pro Se Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35. The Government opposes the motion, arguing that the Court should construe the motion as a habeas motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions and the record of this case, the Court allows Mr. Johnson’s motion to continue under FRCrP 35 but DENlES the motion because…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Sterling Leroy HainesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Jacques ArrousCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Baylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  5. United States v. Ronald Walter Hayes, SrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API