Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 21, 1988No. 87-2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL, Judge.

Appellant Curtis Ford was charged by informations in numerous cases with burglary, theft, dealing in stolen property and criminal mischief. He pleaded guilty in ten cases but was only sentenced in six cases. Three separate scoresheets were used.

*539On appeal, Ford argues that the trial court erred by failing to utilize the same scoresheet for all offenses pending for sentencing. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(1) provides that one guideline scoresheet shall be utilized for each defendant covering all offenses pending before the court for sentencing. In Gallagher v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Price v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Cervantes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Hagins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Delk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rice v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Goss v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API