Legal Opinion

In re Harris

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 26, 2012No. 12 B 12318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JANET S. BAER, Bankruptcy Judge.

Most requests to avoid judicial liens focus on whether those hens may be validly avoided. This matter presents the less common issue of when a judicial lien can be avoided. Debtors Phillip and Noreen Harris (the “Debtors”) have moved to avoid the judicial hen of United Credit Union (the “Creditor”). The Creditor admits that the hen may be avoided but contends that it need not release the hen unless and until the Debtors complete their chapter 13 plan and receive a discharge. For the following reasons, the Debtors’ motion will be granted, but…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lee Servicing Co. v. Wolf (In Re Wolf)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  2. In Re KingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2003
  3. VICTORIO v. BillingsleaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
  4. In Re MorenoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  5. In Re StroudUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re PetersenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2016
  2. In re: Randall Derrick FranklinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
  3. Terry L LittigUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API