Legal Opinion

Kenneth Lundy v. Union Carbide Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Harrisons & Crosfield (Pacific), Inc., a California Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1982No. 81-3221PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Kenneth Lundy appeals a summary judgment dismissing his diversity action against Union Carbide Corporation and Harrisons & Crosfield, Inc., for injuries allegedly sustained while working with asbestos products that were manufactured and distributed by the defendants. The sole issue before us is whether the district court acted properly in finding that Lundy’s action was barred by Oregon’s two-year statute of limitation. 1 Because Lundy presented evidence showing a genuine issue of material fact concerning the time the action accrued, we reverse the judgment and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Maughan v. SW Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. American International Group, Inc. v. American International BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API