Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gold Coast Neighborhood Association v. State.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2017No. SCWC-14-0000472Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

NAKAYAMA, J.

IN WHICH RECKTENWALD, C.J., JOINS

I. INTRODUCTION

Almost a century ago, unknown private parties built a seawall on the makai boundary of private property fronting Diamond Head in order to protect their property from high waves and erosion. Since then, the seawall has been all but abandoned by the property owners, used by the public as a thoroughfare, and infrequently repaired by the State. However, at all times since its construction, the seawall has continued to serve its primary pmqjose—the protection of private property. The specific issue before this court…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. WellsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. LopezHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Miller v. MonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Life of the Land v. CITY COUNCIL, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API