Legal Opinion

Gum v. Murray

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Fi?'si District, Gallatin County. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtGalbraith, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against the appellant, Nelson Murray, and from an order which it is claimed overruled his motion for a new trial. Upon an examination of what purports to be a statement on motion for a new trial, we do not find either a motion for a new trial, or a notice of such motion. After this statement we find in the record the following order: “And on the 2d day of January, 1885, said motion coming on to *11be heard, was overruled, to which Nelson Murray duly excepted.” This order does not indicate what motion was overruled. There being no motion for a new trial,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKinstry v. Clark & CameronMontana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. First Nat. Bank v. McAndrewsMontana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Territory v. BellMontana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steve v. Bonners Ferry Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Arnold v. SinclairMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Harrigan v. LynchMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State v. MasonMontana Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API