Legal Opinion
Davis v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 5, 1991No. 90-1073PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence for sale of a controlled substance and possession with intent to sell are vacated and the cause is remanded for a new trial. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Hart v. State, 529 So.2d 811 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Smith v. State, 512 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Smith v. State, 444 So.2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Hart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crystal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993