Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 5, 1991No. 90-1073PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant’s judgment of conviction and sentence for sale of a controlled substance and possession with intent to sell are vacated and the cause is remanded for a new trial. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Hart v. State, 529 So.2d 811 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Smith v. State, 512 So.2d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Smith v. State, 444 So.2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Hart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crystal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993