Legal Opinion

McConnon & Co. v. Laursen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action on guaranty. From a judgment of tbe District Court of Barnes county; Burke, J., in favor of plaintiff, defendants Nelson and Christensen appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Nuchols, District Judge.

Tbe complaint alleges that plaintiff “is and was a corporation duly organized and existing according to law,” and sets out in full tbe contract between plaintiff and defendant Laursen, *606for the sale to said defendant f. o. b. Winona, Minnesota, of medicines; and other articles manufactured by plaintiff, in which contract plaintiff is designated as “a coloration of Winona, Minnesota,” party of the first part. On the back of the contract is the following writing:

“In consideration of the sum of one dollar to us in hand paid by the party of the first part, and in further…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Weber v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Emerson Manufacturing Co. v. TvedtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Finch, Van Slyck, McConville v. JacksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API