Legal Opinion

Mogul Producing & Refining Co. v. Southern Engine & Pump Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 14, 1922No. 851PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This was a suit by appel-lee against appellant for conversion of two pumps sold by it to the Crescent Oil & Refining Association, and against which it asserted a marterialman’s lien. Prior to the institution of this suit, appellee had filed suit against the Crescent Oil & Refining Association and secured judgment establishing and foreclosing its lien. No sale was had under this judgment, as appellant refused to surrender the pumps, and by its plea in this ease claimed to own them. Judgment was entered for appellee in accordance with its prayer. We take the following statement of the facts and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Summerville v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. D. Sullivan & Co. v. Texas Briquette & Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Keating Implement & Machine Co. v. Marshall Electric Light & Power Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Scaling v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Citizens National Bank v. StraussCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Exchange Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Monocrete Pty. Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Parkdale State Bank v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. City of Wichita Falls v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API