Legal Opinion
Dimitre v. California State University Employees' Union
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 25, 2019No. 2:17-cv-01698Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS DIMITRE, No. 2:17-CV-01698-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES’ UNION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a licensed attorney proceeding pro se moves to reopen discovery so that 18 he may file a motion to compel under Rule 251. The court submitted the matter without oral 19 argument. ECF No. 50. For the reasons provided below, the court DENIES plaintiffs’ motion to 20 reopen discovery. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 In its scheduling order, issued in February…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Jackson v. Laureate, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1999
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.