Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 5, 1979No. 63064PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

368 So.2d 705 (1979)

STATE of Louisiana, Appellee,

v.

Andrew Chrisman PITTMAN, Appellant.

No. 63064.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 5, 1979.

F. Smith Knobloch, Knobloch & Knobloch, Thibodaux, for defendant-relator.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Francis Dugas, Dist. Atty., John J. Erny, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-respondent.

BLANCHE, Justice.[*]

The defendant, Andrew C. Pittman, was charged with theft of $797.00. He was found guilty by a jury on the responsive verdict of guilty of the unauthorized use of movables in the amount of $643.00; he was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GloverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. State v. RoachSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HathornSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. State v. HuntleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. State v. GuidryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. State v. RollinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API