Legal Opinion
Canales v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 2, 2009No. 06-74766Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Jose Eduardo Arellano Canales and Eva Sanches Mejia, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen and reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The BIA acted within its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reconsider because the motion failed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Mauro Antonio Cano-Merida v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Carlos Humberto Ordonez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Varun Goel v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Varun Goel v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007