Verbeck v. Altman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.
We agree with the appellants’ argument that the trial court incorrectly determined that a “jumbo” certificate of approximately $33,000 was not a probate asset. The record demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that no survivorship provision was instituted nor intended.
We would elaborate further on the facts surrounding the title to the certificate; however, the foregoing does not control the outcome of this appeal. The offending probate order conclusively determined a disputed question of ownership in the certificate and held that the estate had no interest therein. This…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Estate of BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- In Re Estate of ZimbrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Howard v. BaumerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Pratt v. GerberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pb v. Dept. of Children & Family Services.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Alexander v. LawhornDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- D.E. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002