Legal Opinion

Verbeck v. Altman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 1993No. 92-0025PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Judge.

We agree with the appellants’ argument that the trial court incorrectly determined that a “jumbo” certificate of approximately $33,000 was not a probate asset. The record demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that no survivorship provision was instituted nor intended.

We would elaborate further on the facts surrounding the title to the certificate; however, the foregoing does not control the outcome of this appeal. The offending probate order conclusively determined a disputed question of ownership in the certificate and held that the estate had no interest therein. This…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. In Re Estate of ZimbrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Howard v. BaumerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Pratt v. GerberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pb v. Dept. of Children & Family Services.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Alexander v. LawhornDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. D.E. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API