Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 15, 1990No. 89-2919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

561 So.2d 23 (1990)

Michael Wayne HILL, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 89-2919.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 15, 1990.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Kim I. Feigin, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.

2Per curiam

The trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress because the police officers involved did not have the founded suspicion of criminal activity necessary to justify an investigatory stop. Terry v. Ohio,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Cobb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. State v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Brodsky v. Knight-Ridder, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Lang v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Stanton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. State v. ArmasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API