Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hix v. Robertson

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided July 12, 2006No. 10-05-00214-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceTom Gray, Chief Justice

Notwithstanding the Texas Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ross, regarding what it takes to become a party bound by a judgment, I have grave concerns about the consequences of the State filing an amicus brief in this proceeding. Ross v. Nat’l Ctr. for the Empl. of the Disabled, No. 05-1082, — S.W.3d -, -, 2006 WL 1651692, *1, 49 Tex. Sup. J. 760, 2006 Tex. LEXIS 551, *1-2 (Tex. June 16, 2006) (“But the trial court had no jurisdiction either to enter judgment or to enforce it against a party who had neither been properly served nor appeared.”). My concern arises out of this Court’s holding in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richard M. Ross v. National Center for the Employment of the Disabled, as Successor in Interest to Access Healthsource, Inc., Assignee of O.R. BrookerTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Avila v. Lone Star Radiology, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API