Legal Opinion
United States v. New Orleans Pacific R. Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 27, 1919No. 164, 165, 166PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
248 U.S. 507 (1919)
UNITED STATES ET AL.
v.
NEW ORLEANS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
v.
NEW ORLEANS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
v.
NEW ORLEANS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.
Nos. 164, 165, 166.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 10, 11, 1918.
Decided January 27, 1919.
APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Kearful for the United States.
Mr. Mark Norris, Mr. F.G. Hudson and Mr. H.H. White, with whom Mr. J.G. Palmer was on the briefs, for appellees.
2Opinion of the Court · DevanterJustice Van Devanter
These suits are so related that they may be…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. San Jacinto Tin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hamblin v. Western Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- West Coast Exploration Co. v. McKay Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Eaton Shale Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1977
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Gavin A. Ruotolo, Etc. v. Gavin A. Ruotolo, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Tommy A. Srnsky David M. SrnskyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.