Hanna v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Judge.
This case emanates from the chancellor’s granting a $45,065 judgment against appellants, Bobby and Delta Hanna, who are husband and wife. The judgment was based on a written commodity agreement between appellee and appellant Bobby Hanna. Although Delta was not a party to the agreement, the trial judge declared the judgment a lien on her farm land and bank accounts because she assisted Bobby in wrongfully hindering and defrauding his creditors — in this case, the appellee. On appeal, appellants argue that the evidence does not support the court’s (1) granting the judgment, or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Driggs & Co.'s Bank v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- United States v. JohnstonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1965
- May v. State National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Burns v. LucichCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- Kelker v. HendricksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.