Talcott v. Wabash Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Appeal by tlie plaintiff, J ames Talcott, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of March, 1894, upon the report of a referee, dismissing the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed upon the opinion of the referee rendered upon the decision of the case.
Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Follett and Parker, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
The opinion of the referee was as follows:
George C. Holt, Referee:
When tlie plaintiff rested, his counsel elected to suffer a nonsuit as to the third and fourth causes of action, and upon tlie defendant’s motion, I dismissed the first cause of action. This left the second cause of action, being the claim for the loss of personal baggage belonging to one Cullom, the plaintiff’s assignor,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Myrick v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Quimby v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Condict v. Grand Trunk Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Milnor v. . N.Y. and N.H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Talcott v. Wabash RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1892