Legal Opinion

Slessor v. Board of Education

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1932No. Docket No. 87, Calendar No. 35,878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Defendant board of education purchased from Mower & Rose, dealers, certain gymnasium equipment, to be installed by the seller in a school building. Mower & Rose were not operating under the workmen’s compensation act (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8407 et seq.), and employed Alexander Slessor, who was an employer operating under the act, to make the installation. Mr. Slessor was a general contractor, and for seven or eight years had installed gymnasium equipment for Mower & Rose, collected pay for doing so, and paid his employees. While about the work of installation Mr. Slessor was killed and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacobson v. Weidman Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. Alsar CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Davidson v. Wayne County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Scott v. Alsar CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API