People v. Small
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*733While a defendant is not entitled as a matter of law to pretrial notice of the People’s intention to offer evidence pursuant to People v Molineux (168 NY 264 [1901]) or to a pretrial hearing on the admissibility of such evidence (see generally People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350, 362 [1981]; People v Torres, 300 AD2d 46, 46-47 [1st Dept 2002]; cf. CPL 240.43), we outlined in People v Ventimiglia a procedure to be followed in order to avoid unfairness to the defendant. We noted that a prosecutor seeking to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. BaberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. Yu-Jen ChangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.