Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Goodbread

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided March 31, 1981No. NCM 80 2669Published

1DissentGladis, Judge

I dissent. I cannot join in affirming the accused’s guilty pleas because the Government failed to adhere to the terms of the pretrial agreement pursuant to which those pleas were entered.

The accused agreed to plead guilty in exchange for the convening authority’s agreement to limit the approved sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 50 days, 2 months of forfeitures, and reduction to pay grade E-l. He was found guilty pursuant to his pleas and sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 75 days, forfeiture of $299.00 per month for 2 months…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. Pearson v. CoxUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. ThomasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. ClarkU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API